Multiple Drugs and Health Consequences in Diabetes Mellitus Type II

Bhattacharya AK, Rana K, Singh S, Bamaniya B and Sonkar CK*

Department of Medicine, Parul Institute of Medical Science & Research (PIMSR), Parul Sevashram Hospital, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

*Correspondence: Chetan Kumar Sonkar, Department of Medicine, Parul Institute of Medical Science & Research (PIMSR), Parul Sevashram Hospital, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Received on 15 June 2021; Accepted on 30 July 2021; Published on 12 August 2021

Copyright © 2021 Bhattacharya AK, et al. This is an open access article and is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Aim and Objective: To find the association between polypharmacy and health consequences in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Materials and Methods: 50 patients with multiple drugs (two or more) and morbidity, glycemic control, macrovascular complications, hospitalization, gastrointestinal disorders, cost of medicine were studied. History, physical examination, relevant investigation, and consequences of drugs were also studied.
Results: Male to female: 32:18; average age: 44 years. Findings were: hyperglycemia is seen in 34 patients, hypoglycemia in 2, retinopathy in 10, coronary artery disease (CAD) by electrocardiogram (ECG) and 2D echo in 12, old myocardial infarction in 3, renal function test abnormality in 6, stroke in 2, hypertension in 15, dyslipidemia in 13, hypothyroidism in 3, and hospitalization due to any of the above in 5.
Conclusion: Diabetes, a metabolic disorder, due to chronicity leads to macrovascular and microvascular complications which in turn are compelled to increase the number of medications due to uncontrolled hyperglycemia. More than two-third of patients in our study showed uncontrolled hyperglycemia. Diabetes has multiple sites and mechanisms of altered physiological and pathological processes. It is practical to have the requirement of more than two drugs when blood sugar in diabetes is not controlled. Also, it is obvious that the simultaneous use of more than one drug-having different mechanism of action appears to have an impact on treatments to control hyperglycemia. Sometimes, multiple drugs/therapy may give rise to undesirable side effects and it may be due to drug-drug or disease drug interaction. Furthermore, the activity of multiple targets by multiple drugs requires additional study. Multiple drugs in diabetes were seen more in males with geriatric age groups. Main reasons being comorbidities, which may be the main cause of morbidity and mortality, especially CAD, heart failure and diabetic cardiomyopathy. There is an indirect relationship between the glycemic control and the development and progression of clinical manifestations of comorbidities. Various comorbid diseases in diabetes require concomitant medications, that increases pill burden. Tailoring medical therapies to the patient’s biological characteristics may help to optimize disease treatment, thereby improving overall prognosis and decreasing comorbidities’ risk. Appropriate exercise and diet may reduce hyperglycemia with reduction in pill burden.

Keywords

diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, health consequences, multiple drugs, polypharmacy

Abbreviations

T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; CAD: coronary artery disease; ECG: electrocardiogram; DM: diabetes mellitus; MI: myocardial infarction; DR: diabetic retinopathy; RBS: random blood sugar; HbA1C: hemoglobin A1c; LDL: low density lipoprotein

Introduction

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a metabolic syndrome having multiple etiological factors characterized by chronic hyperglycemia with disturbances in carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism resulting from defects in insulin secretion, action or both [1]. Diabetes prevalence around the globe is estimated to be 9.3% (463 million people) in 2019 and is expected to reach 10.2% (578 million) by 2030 and 10.9% (700 million) by 2045 (Figure 1). Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance globally is estimated to be 7.5% (374 million) in 2019 and forecasted to reach 8.0% (454 million) by 2030 and 8.6% (548 million) by 2045 [2]. There has been a claim of about ~4 million adult deaths due to diabetes in 2017 of which more than 75% people live in lower and middle-income countries. In the world, India is considered as the “diabetes capital”; a home to 74 million diabetics with a prevalence of ~8.7% among the adult population [3]. It is one of the leading causes for premature deaths when improperly managed and can lead to various health issues including heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, blindness, nerve damage, leg and foot amputation and death [4].

Prevalence of diabetes
Figure 1: Prevalence of diabetes.

The complications are classified as macrovascular and microvascular, which are increasing worldwide aggregating to major health problems in developing and developed countries. Alteration in microvascular function may arise even before overt hyperglycemia and vascular pathologic changes manifest [5]. Several landmark studies such as United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) have demonstrated that strict glycemic control does limit microvascular diseases while attempts to improve macrovascular outcomes through glucose lowering interventions [6].

Polypharmacy means the usage of multiple medicines [7]. In the United States, among people suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 54% of the cases were found to have an association with polypharmacy [8]. Adverse drug reaction, drug-drug and drug-food interactions can be characterized by an increased daily intake of drugs [9]. For the management of DM and its complications, avoiding polypharmacy not only may improve target outcome for the patients but also contributes in the addition of unessential medication to the drug regimen [10]. It may not have a positive effect on the patient, their family, health system and economy and also adversely effects their adherence to medicines, quality of life and life expectancy and can lead to minimal blood glucose control and hospital admission [8, 11, 12]. Many factors leading to the risk of polypharmacy in the patients include multiple care providers, ageing population, complex drug therapies, multiple chronic condition in a single patient and adverse drug reactions. Elderly adults are having a high risk of receiving polypharmacy [13].

Materials and Methods

In Parul Sevashram Hospital attached to Parul Institute of Medical Science & Research (PIMSR), an observational study was carried out in the duration of 14 months from January 2018 to February 2020 for 50 patients after getting approval from Institutional Ethics Committee.

The data was collected with all the information about the patient’s complaints, consequences of drugs and the laboratory results in the Case Record Form which was predesigned and the analysis is made from the data provided.

  • Observation was carried out to find out the scope of the study in the Parul Sevashram Hospital.
  • Relevant literatures were reviewed.
  • Data of the patients was collected and recorded in the Case Record Form and analysed the consequences of polypharmacy in diabetic patients.

Study criteria

  • Inclusion criteria
  1. Patients of either gender between the age group of 20–70 years of age (both years inclusive)
  2. Patients with known case of T2DM for the minimum of 2 years
  3. Patients on more than or equal to 2 medications
  • Exclusion criteria
  1. Lactating and pregnant woman or planning to become pregnant
  2. Patients with diabetes mellitus type 1
  3. Unwilling patients/psychiatric patients
  4. Other disease conditions or laboratory parameters as per investigators discretion
  • Biophysical estimations
    Medical/medication history, physical examination, vital signs, laboratory investigation- RBS, HbA1C, ECG, 2D echocardiography (if required), renal function test, relevant investigations and consequences of drugs were studied and recorded.
  • Statistical analysis
    The data was represented graphically in MS-Excel with median values.

Results

During the study period, 50 patients were examined, interviewed and their prescriptions were studied. The patients were analyzed and the main characteristic of this study was the relation between polypharmacy and the health consequences with the help of history, physical examination and laboratory investigation.

Out of the 50, there were 32 males (64%) and 18 females (36%). Median age of the patients in the study population ranged from 20–70 years. The average age of the study population was 58 years. About 21–30 years were 4 (8%), 31– 40 years were 7 (14%), 41–50 years were 10 (20%), 51–60 years were 11 (22%), 61–70 years were 18 (36%)        (Figure 2). So, it can be concluded that as the age increased, the level of comorbidity in relation to patient’s age increased. The present study revealed elderly patients suffering from T2DM had a greater risk of suffering from macrovascular and microvascular complications which leads to polypharmacy.

Gender ratio/age wise distribution of patients
Figure 2: Gender ratio/age wise distribution of patients.

With a study population of 50 patients, 24 (48%) patients were having family history of diabetes, 12 (24%) patients claimed that they were non-vegetarian, 17 (34%) of them were smokers, and 3 (6%) of them consumed alcohol occasionally. Hypoglycemia in 2 and hyperglycemia was seen in 34 (68%) patients. In this study, out of 34 patients having hyperglycemia, 10 were smokers. Smoking causes inflammation and increases oxidative stress leading to insulin resistance which can further lead to macro and microvascular complications.

Diabetic patients suffered from various comorbidities: retinopathy in 10 (20%), coronary artery disease (CAD) by ECG and 2D Echo in 12 (24%), old myocardial infarction (MI) in 3 (6%), and renal function test abnormality in 6 (12%).

Stroke in 2 (4%), hypertension in 15 (30%), dyslipidemia in 13 (26%), hypothyroidism in 3 (6%), and hospitalization due to any of the above in 5 (10%). Dyslipidemic patients had high plasma triglyceride concentration and LDL cholesterol. 8 patients with hyperglycemia had high triglycerides. Therefore, these patients were at a higher risk of having cardiovascular complications, stroke in the future (Table 1) (Figure 3 and 4).

S. No Complications No. of Patients (N = 50) 
1. Hyperglycemia 34
2. Hypoglycemia 2
3. Hyperglycemia with smoking 10
4. Retinopathy 10
5. Coronary artery disease 12
6. Old myocardial infraction 3
7. Renal abnormality 6
8. Stroke 2
9. Hypertension 15
10. Dyslipidemia 13
11. Hypothyroidism 3
12. Hospitalization (any reason) 5

Table 1: List of complications.

General description of the study population.
Figure 3: General description of the study population.
Diabetes and comorbidities.
Figure 4: Diabetes and comorbidities.

This study suggested that the level of polypharmacy increased with the age of patients and the maximum was in the age group of 61–70 years.

Along with the modern medicines, use of alternative medications was also seen. This study estimated that 5 (10%) patients consumed homeopathic medicines and 6 (12%) patients consumed Ayurveda drugs parallel to the allopathic medicines.

Discussion

Diabetes, a metabolic disorder often leads to various disease-related complications i.e., macrovascular and microvascular complications which in turn are compelled to increase the number of medications. Polypharmacy leads to an increase in the pill burden and can further lead to various other complications. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of polypharmacy in diabetic patients aged 20–70 years in the Vadodara district. This study revealed that the number of drugs were between 3–10 in each patient.

From this study, it is evident that the polypharmacy increased with an increase in the age and was seen majorly in the elderly patients i.e., the geriatric age group of 61–70 years. There were 64% males, 36% females and the average age was 58 years. A similar study by Upadhyay DK et al estimated that 59.59% of the study population were males and 43.41% were females [14]. The present study reveals that the prevalence of diabetes was more in males. This study evaluated that the study population suffered from at least one common condition, i.e., hypertension (30%) or dyslipidemia (26%). DM is associated with a considerably high risk of premature atherosclerosis, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD) and peripheral arterial disease [15, 16]. Also, there is an association between atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and high serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes [17, 18]. In diabetics, both hypertension and dyslipidemia increase the chances of cardiovascular diseases. Researches show that around 80% of diabetic patients die because of cardiovascular disorders [19].

According to the American Diabetes Association, the target fasting glucose values range from 80–130 mg/dl and postprandial blood sugar levels are targeted at < 180 mg/dl. Therefore, levels of fasting blood glucose > 130 mg/dl and postprandial level > 180 mg/dl are considered as having poor control [20]. Based on this definition, the present study revealed that 68% of the patients had uncontrolled diabetes (hyperglycemia). Of the hyperglycemic patients, 10 were smokers. However, both the American Diabetes Association and the International Diabetes Foundation do not currently include smoking as a modifiable risk factor for diabetes development or consider smoking status as a factor that should be prompted in the diabetes screening [21, 22]. 20% of the patients having retinopathy suffer from DM which is the most common complication. There is an indirect relationship between glycemic control and the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). A decrease in glycosylated hemoglobin levels was associated with a significant decrease in the progression of DR [23]. 4% of the patients involved in the study had a stroke. T2DM is a lifestyle disorder, it has additional risk factors in future like stroke, obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia [24]. 6% of the patients suffered from hypothyroidism and there are studies that suggest that thyroid hormone therapy can be looked at as a therapeutic strategy to alleviate diabetes and atherosclerosis. 24% of patients had CAD and 6% had old MI. DM is independently associated with the development of heart failure. The increase in the myocardial vulnerability in diabetes along with other risk factors may be responsible for distinct cardiomyopathy specific to diabetes, termed diabetic cardiomyopathy [25].

It is true that literature studies in various parts of the world suggests that diabetes is associated with various comorbid diseases and requires concomitant medications. However, among 91 million people residing in West Bengal, the prevalence of diabetes is quite high, about 12% in Kolkata and 13% in Howrah [26]. This study tried to evaluate the co-morbidity which leads to polypharmacy in diabetes patients. So, by reducing the pill burden and providing maximum benefit to the patients is most important. Also, more research is required on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of appropriate and scientific fixed drug combinations. Therefore, delicate balance is required to add drugs, control the disease and avoid adverse drug effects. There is a need for critical decision to tilt the balance of benefits in favor of the patients when adjuvant therapy is required and to avoid side effects of multiple medicines being prescribed.

Conclusion

Diabetes, a metabolic disorder, due to chronicity leads to macrovascular and microvascular complications which in turn are compelled to increase the number of medications due to uncontrolled hyperglycemia. More than two-third of the patients in our study showed uncontrolled hyperglycemia.

Diabetes has multiple sites and mechanisms of altered physiological and pathological processes. It is practical to have the requirement of more than two drugs when blood sugar in diabetes is not controlled. Also, it is obvious that the simultaneous use of more than one drug-having different mechanism of action appears to have an impact on treatments to control hyperglycemia. Sometimes, multiple drugs/therapy may give rise to undesirable side effects and it may be due to drug-drug interaction or disease drug interaction. Furthermore, the activity of multiple targets by multiple drugs requires additional study.

Multiple drugs in diabetes were seen more in males with geriatric age groups. Main reasons being comorbidities, which may be the main cause of morbidity and mortality, especially CAD, heart failure, and diabetic cardiomyopathy. There is an indirect relationship between the glycemic control and the development and progression of clinical manifestations of comorbidities. Various comorbid diseases in diabetes require concomitant medications, that increases pill burden.

Tailoring medical therapies to the patient’s biological characteristics may help to optimize disease treatment, thereby improving overall prognosis and decreasing comorbidities’ risk. Appropriate exercise and diet may reduce hyperglycemia with reduction in pill burden.

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Unavailability of funds
  • Study includes one geographical location only
  • Single-arm study that needs a control group

Recommendation

Need to follow up the same patient group for a long time (cohort study). A large sample size (robust) is needed to substantiate the objective of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539-53.
  2. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.
  3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th Edn. 2017.
  4. Asif M. The prevention and control the type-2 diabetes by changing lifestyle and dietary pattern. J Educ Health Promot. 2014;3:1.
  5. Chawla A, Chawla R, Jaggi S. Microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes mellitus: Distinct or continuum? Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20(4):546-51.
  6. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577-589.
  7. Marengoni A, Onder G. Guidelines, polypharmacy, and drug-drug interactions in patients with multimorbidity. BMJ. 2015;350:h1059.
  8. Grant RW, Devita NG, Singer DE, et. Polypharmacy and medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1408-412.
  9. Austin RP. Polypharmacy as a risk factor in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2006;19(1):13-16.
  10. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. Jama. 2005;294(6):716-24.
  11. Montiel-Luque A, Núñez-Montenegro AJ, Martin-Aurioles E, et al. Medication-related factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients older than 65 years with polypharmacy. PloS one. 2017;12(2): e0171320.
  12. Willey CJ, Andrade SE, Cohen J, et al. Polypharmacy with oral antidiabetic agents: an indicator of poor glycemic control. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(8):435-40.
  13. Bauer S, Nauck MA. Polypharmacy in people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes is justified by current guidelines–a comprehensive assessment of drug prescriptions in patients needing inpatient treatment for diabetes-associated problems. Diabet Med. 2014;31(9):1078-85.
  14. Upadhyay DK, Palaian S, Ravi Shankar PR, et al. Prescribing pattern in diabetic outpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Nepal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2007;1(4):248-55.
  15. Durrington P. Hyperlipidaemia 3Ed: Diagnosis and Management. CRC Press; 2007.
  16. Laing SP. Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD, et al. Mortality from heart disease in a cohort of 23,000 patients with insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46(6):760-65.
  17. West KM, Ahuja MM, Bennett PH, et al. The role of circulating glucose and triglyceride concentrations and their interactions with other “risk factors” as determinants of arterial disease in nine diabetic population samples from the WHO multinational study. Diabetes care. 1983;6(4):361-69.
  18. Howard BV, Robbins DC, Sievers ML, et al. LDL cholesterol as a strong predictor of coronary heart disease in diabetic individuals with insulin resistance and low LDL: The strong heart study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(3):830-35.
  19. Adhikari A, Indu R, Bhowal T, et al. Evaluation of adverse effects due to antidiabetic and cardiovascular drugs in a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(7):3101-106.
  20. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010. Diabetes care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S11-S61.
  21. Auerbach S, Filer D, Reif D, et al. Prioritizing environmental chemicals for obesity and diabetes outcomes research: a screening approach using Toxcast™ high-throughput data. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(8):1141-154.
  22. http://www.idf.org/
  23. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-86.
  24. Dutton GR, Lewis CE. The Look AHEAD Trial: implications for lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;58(1):69-75.
  25. Bell DSH. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(10):2949-951.
  26. http://www.indushealthplus.com/west‑bengal-healthstatistics.html